Sunday, December 04, 2005

Troy Redux

I saw the clunker Troy while home for Thanksgiving. My brother has this killer DVD collection, so I usually just wait to see what he's got rather than pay Blockbuster. I'm glad I didn''t spend any money on this one.


Troy wasn't terrible, just uninspired. And it really didn't do the origianl Homeric Epic any justice at all. I did think Brad Pitt's Achilles wasn't bad. He was a Heroic Age guided missile, and the first fight presented him exactly as such. Agamemnon releases Achilles as a precision guided munition, and eliminates the opposing army's champion and ends the war in a single subclavian stab of shock and awe.

I thought that was an interesting modern interpretation of the character. Too bad he comes off as such a sullen, prissy boy second-guessing his purpose for most of the rest of the film. It's like a JADM Satellite Guided Bomb saying to the loader, "I know I'm purpose built to incinerate Saddam's underground bunker, but I'd rather be reading Jane Austen by the pool."

To be fair, the Iliad has Achilles sulking in his tent for much of the war precisely because he is a prima donna. But this film is so taken with the idea of using big budget effects to recreate the time and place, and having big name stars doing the heavy lifting, that the scriptwriters must not have been paid to provide any characterization. Achilles motivations remain fairly unclear beyond a rather standard: I'm doing it for fortune and glory.

OK, than why sit out the war? What does it matter if you think Agamemnon is a blowhard, so long as he gives you the chance to fight?


The film's answer is that the hardened Achilles has fallen in love with Briseis, a Trojan princess captured during his practically one-handed amphibious assault of the Trojan shore.

Unfortunately for Hollywood, some of us actually read the classics. Achilles was kind of a "man's man," if you know what I mean. Briseis was the sticking point in the Achilles/Agamemnon alliance in the book, but it was an argument over chattel, not love. Achilles was in a long-term relationship with his cousin Patroclus.

So when the film's rote chronology eventually reaches the point when Hector accidentally kills Patroclus, the audience is left to wonder why Achilles is so beside himself with grief that he stops the entire war to challenge Hector and hold 12 days of games. (This last pronouncement is especially jarring to modern sensibilities.)

They tried. They really did. The movie looks good. The actors are all pretty. The Classical "kung fu" fights are pretty good. The source material is first rate epic stuff. But it clunks. You can hear the film sputter and cough underneath the shiny hood.

Stuff like this still has the power to spark the imagination. But it simply doesn't translate to modern media. Two hours and change is no way to present the Iliad. CG generated armies are nice, but can't hold a candle to the spectacle of Troy's myriad of Asiatic allies mustering in the mind's eys while reading the verse.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Didn't really like the movie at all. Filmed for the physique and not the story.

Holy Mother Eph said...

I haven't seen the movie. Pitt is in the same catagory as Clooney for me. There was a faint glimmer of a chance that I might view this film because of its classic inspiration, but a companion's words of persuasion have been effective in firming determent.

Anonymous said...

I saw the movie. Liked it for what is was but thought, like you jrf, that they cut some corners for the sake of 21st century block buster moviedom. They should have played up his homo insestuous relationship more. Very few people know that some of the most deadly die hard warriors in history have been fags. How fucked up is that? Take for example Leonidas and his 300. Just my 2 cents. Molon Lobe

jrf said...

Sigh.

Such language. Could we keep this "family oriented" and the slurs to less than a minimum? Really, they aren't funny.

Anonymous said...

Sure. My deepest apologies. Just figured that with your postings of war and warriors and pics of scantily clad women and all( you know...family oriented stuff like that)..... that it was big boy rules here.

Anonymous said...

How shall we refer to the "Alternate Lifestyle" crowd:

Fudgepackers

Butt Bandits

Limp Wrist

Fans of Rosie O'Donnell

jrf said...

Dudes. You don't know my family.

Sure it's big boy rules. But that doesn't mean you have to be mean and nasty.

And "Fans of Rosie O'Donnell" seems like a good compromise.

Anonymous said...

Does this mean that "Turd Burgular" is out?

Anonymous said...

What about "Fishermen for the one eyed trouser trout"?

Anonymous said...

Can we say that someone has "too much sugar in their tank"?

Anonymous said...

Now now..... you heathens shalt not offendeth our gracious host/hostess.(?) Although, I might add, Mr. Carlin said that there are 7 words we can't use. And the constitution says that there are 0 words that we cannot use. Go figure.

Anonymous said...

i am offended by all of this!!!

Anonymous said...

You're just jealous, Rosie. None of the above is in your repitoire.