Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
You can't learn Martial Arts from a book?
On the other hand, after practicing for over a decade now, I realize there's a lot in martial arts that books just can't capture. Seriously. Timing and distancing, for example, are really hard to capture.
But here's an interesting take on the subject that might raise a few eyebrows.
Mr. Kerry, let me say up front, I have not volunteered to go to Iraq. However, I know two people who did go -- both college graduates.
One was my roommate in college; a career Army officer who has been published several times in the Army's Infantry journals on innovative tactics and training tools. He's the kind of officer you hope we have plenty of in the service.
The other was a good friend from high school. He was an active duty Marine officer after graduation and commissioning. He was activated out of the reserves and left a high paying job in financial planning to serve when his country called.
Both of these men served their full tours in the combat zone. (Although, to be fair to you, they were not -- by God's grace -- wounded even once to my knowledge. ) They were both very much in harm's way. My former roommate was interviewed by the Army about his experiences in the Battle for Fallujah.
Your "gaffe" was exposed on the very same day a young friend of mine volunteered for duty in the combat zone. He did not need to volunteer. He has a very cushy job using his business degree in worthwhile service. He could stay home and drink beer and chase girls. But he volunteered to go where he was needed because he feels the call to serve.
These three men, only examples of the many men and women in our country's service, deserve more for their sacrifice than you using them for political theater by insulting their intelligence. Sure, politicians on both sides are guilty of this, but as a combat wounded vet -- a former Naval officer -- you should know better.
When I first heard the news story about your statement, the local radio host was very clear that you were adamantly refusing to apologize for your statement. I was not shocked, however, when I later heard you had apologized on the Don Imus radio program. Wiffle. Waffle. Vote for the $80M, before you vote against it.
I also heard you said you would never insult the men and women in our armed forces. Gee, my father, a Vietnam Vet himself, has a very clear memory of you telling Congress -- while wearing OD green utilities, no less -- about all those "atrocities" being committed by American servicemen in Vietnam. He was pretty insulted at being lumped in with a few very bad folks, and he doesn't recall ever getting an apology.
Leadership is not about taking cheap shots depending upon which audience you happen to be standing in front of. Anyone who speaks in front of people will make mistakes, but you shouldn't need to apologize about something like this. You might want to talk to your colleague and fellow vet, John McCain, about leadership and principles. I hope to have the honor of voting for him again.
Now, flame on if you must, dear readers. I may or may not read your comments... And I will try not to be too political in the future.
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Bujinkan Hombu Dojo
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Now that's how to review 12-Inches worth of Samuel L. Jackson...
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Coming to Grips with a Dangerous Situation
Few subjectsget the knife fighting crowd more stirred up than the "correct wa(s)" to hold a knife. Crazy methids of gripping leap out of the woodwork.
Look, without getting wildly technical, there are basically two ways to hold a knife:
"Forward." The knife is held so the blade extends up from the thumb.
"Reverse." The knife blade extends below the heel of the hand.
All the main variations entail the angle of the blade to the arm, and the super important (yeah, right) placement of the fingers -- especially the thumb. What gets all the so-called experts in a dither is that digit placement... Again, you want some good, basic advice? Hold the knife so you can really hold it. Any finger placement that risks losing the knife is probably not good.
Anyway, my martial arts class got involved in a discussion of the reverse grip. It seems the question arose about whether the sharp edge of the blade belongs to the outside (i.e. away from the forearm and towards your attacker) or inside (i.e. facing the forearm and away from your attacker). The class, for whatever reason, split about 75% in favor of an outside reverse grip.
Our Teacher and Fearless Leader (FL) had contacted his own instructor, a rather well-known and respected martial artist ("He Who Shall Remain Nameless," or HWSRN) on the question. HWSRN also believes in an outside reverse grip. His standard answer was apparently provided: "Keep the dangerous part of the weapon between you and the bad guy."
I emailed my FL the following story, and now post it here for whatever it is worth...
I had a drinking buddy for many years named Bush (uh, no... not the famous one). Bush was a great storyteller and a former Marine. We talked about life, the universe and everything while drinking. The subject of knife fighting came up exactly once.
The Marines gave Bush a single block of instruction on how to use a Ka-Bar knife in combat. He learned the proper way to slit a throat and how to hold his knife in a last-ditch struggle.
The Marines told Bush to always grip the knife in the outside reverse grip. All he then had to do was punch and fight like his life depended on it. The idea was that punching was a pretty natural fighting reaction and the sharp part of the Ka-Bar would generally end up where it needed to be to do damage.
This was back in the days just after Vietnam. Formal martial arts-type training in the services wasn't widespread. On the other hand, plenty of combat vets were still in the service and knew how to get the job done. While this style of knife fighting lacks elegance, subtlety, or technique to recommend it, there is a definite sense of simplicty to the instruction. It gave the young Marines something useful to walk away with and not get lost amid their other, more specialized training.
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Ma-ai in Suwari Waza
My class was recently drilling three common seated kata in class. A member of one group I practiced with asked our teacher the question "How far apart should the two people start?" It's an excellent question; his answer was: "Far enough." It was the kind of answer that can boil a beginner's blood. A white belt wants an answer. Actually, the white belt mind wants THE answer.
I kept my mouth shut during the class -- which is what lead to this blog. Because I have a very real opinion on the issue. However, I recognized the teacher's answer has wisdom too.
Ma-ai, or "critical distancing" is very important in any martial arts encounter, whether it is a prearranged kata, or spontaneous sparring. Distancing is disregarded at the martial artist's peril. In one sense, there is always a specific "critical distance" that allows Tori to counter Uke. And Tori should always be striving to control the critical distance. However, this isn't always possible. Tori will have to make do with the distance that is available as he shifts to a better position.
In the kata we were practicing, the two actors both start in Fudoza, a sort of "half-lotus" position in which the person sits on the left heel and folds the right leg so the right foot sits in the crook of the left knee. It is already an awkward position for Westerners, and often it presents plenty of challenges that overshadow finding distance in the kata. Uke moves first, stepping up onto his right foot and reaching out to grab Tori's lapel. A common issue is that the Tori feels crowded, and finds it hard to act in accordance with the remaining movements of the kata. In particular, there is an instruction to "lean back" as Uke grabs. Under most circumstances, Tori falls back.
Certainly, we could take the attitude that "Uke is Never Wrong." This is a perfectly valid position and should definitely be trained. However, when these little things crop up, I think it's important to play rather than discount instructions out of hand. So here's my hypotheosis...
Assumption: The suwari waza in question apparently originate in the Takagi Yoshin Ryu, which was used by samurai tasked with guarding a lord mostly inside enclosed spaces. Many of the seated kata seem to involve a typical scenario in which the lord and his men are greeting guests in a formal setting.
Now, if I'm a body guard, my job really should begin long before an actual attack. I would be very concerned with proper distancing and arrange my seating accordingly. I would probably not want to let someone sit so close as to simply reach out and touch me. I want them to have to make at least one good step. If I'm really in control, I would set the distance outside the arc of a slashing short sword.
With this in mind, I experimented with the distancing of the kata. I found that the two actors in the kata start a little further apart than normal. Uke was forced to make a good step forward to initiate the attack. This eliminated the problem of crowding. It also gave Tori both the distance and space to perform the proscribed response.
I also found that Uke naturall pulled Tori forward with the grab. It now made sense for Tori to lean back to maintain the required distance. Tori did not topple backward, because Uke's grab provided enough resistence to pull into a neutral position. Suddenly, those strange instructions made sense!
Am I right? I won't say that I am; it's just one perspective. But I think the process of exploring the questions is important.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Always Faithful
Our flag's unfurled to every breeze
From dawn to setting sun;
We have fought in ev'ry clime and place
Where we could take a gun;
In the snow of far-off Northern lands
And in sunny tropic scenes;
You will find us always on the job--The United States Marines.
Which we are proud to serve
In many a strife we've fought for life
And never lost our nerve;
If the Army and the Navy
Ever look on Heaven's scenes;
They will find the streets are guarded By United States Marines.
Yeah. There's more than one verse.
Semper Fi!
Sunday, September 10, 2006
The Ranger Creed
RANGERS LEAD THE WAY!
Into the Fire
You gave your love to me and lay your young body down
Up the stairs, into the fire
Up the stairs, into the fire
I need you near, but love and duty called you someplace higher
Somewhere up the stairs, into the fire
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your strength give us strength
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your strength give us strength
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
You lay your hand on me
Then walked into the darkness of your smoky grave
Up the stairs, into the fire
Up the stairs, into the fire
I need your kiss, but love and duty called you someplace higher
Somewhere up the stairs, into the fire
May your strength give us strength
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your strength give us strength
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your strength give us strength
May your faith give us faith
May your hope give us hope
May your love give us love
May your love bring us love
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
The Importance of a Pure Heart
He was able to convince a slight old man to perform a filmed demonstration for his article. Gluck secured the assistance of several off-duty Air Force MPs and the use of a few spare Judo mats. The young men were all experienced fighters and athletes with a knowledge of karate and judo, and were even armed with a few bokken. Gluck set up his camera with high expectations.
And his expectations should've been high, because the old martial artist he had engaged for the filmed demo was Morihei Ueshiba, founder of Aikido.
The MPs attacked Ueshiba for several minutes, but never laid a hand on the man. Instead, they broke out into amazed laughter and childlike giggling as they fell over and into each other while Ueshiba danced out of the way.
Later, the editors of True rejected the film as staged. They found it impossible to believe the little old man could keep a group of sturdy young men from easily catching him. They pointed out the MPs often weren't even looking at Ueshiba, and their stupid grins indicated -- obviously -- that they weren't taking the attack seriously.
Gluck, a well educated man, was struck by a Biblical passage during the filming. Luke 4:28, "And all they in the synagogue, when they heard these things, were filled with wrath. And rose up, and thrust him out of the city, and led him unto the brow of the hill whereon their city was built, that they might cast him down headlong. But he (Jesus), passing through the midst of them, went his way." And also John 10:39 "Again they tried to arrest him, but he escaped from their hands." Gluck expressed these thoughts to both a minister who viewed his pictures, and Ueshiba himself. Both men agreed with Gluck, but Ueshiba (an adherent to a splinter Shinto mystic group) claimed, "In learning aiki, you must make yourself pure. He who was already pure, intuitively knew aiki from the beginning."
Jay Gluck wrote a book: Zen Combat, and you can read more about his adventures in martial arts.